How do case management and guardianship differ in terms of enforcement?

The distinction between case management and guardianship in terms of enforcement primarily revolves around the legal authority and responsibilities that guardians possess. Guardians are appointed by the court and have the legal authority to make decisions for their wards, including decisions regarding health care, which encompasses the enforcement of compliance with medication regimens. This authority allows guardians to ensure that their wards adhere to prescribed medical treatments, thereby promoting the welfare and safety of those individuals under their guardianship.

In contrast, case managers typically play a supportive role and assist individuals in accessing resources, coordinating care, and advocating for their needs, but they generally do not hold the legal authority to enforce compliance. This limitation means that while case managers can encourage or facilitate adherence to treatment plans, they lack the enforcement power that guardians possess. Therefore, the correct choice highlights the significant role guardians play in ensuring compliance, which is a fundamental aspect of their responsibilities in protecting the health and well-being of their wards.