In a situation involving surgery recommendation, what should a guardian do if the ward's living will states a preference?

When addressing a situation involving a ward's surgery recommendation and the presence of a living will, it is crucial for a guardian to prioritize the instructions specified in that document. A living will outlines the individual’s wishes regarding medical treatment, particularly in scenarios where they may no longer be able to communicate those preferences themselves, such as during surgery.

Adhering to the instructions in the living will is essential because it respects the autonomy and previously expressed wishes of the ward. The living will serves as a legal document that reflects the ward’s values and desires regarding their medical care, and a guardian has an ethical obligation to honor those choices whenever possible. This action aligns with the fundamental principle of upholding the rights of individuals in guardianship arrangements.

While other options might present varying avenues, such as ignoring the living will or seeking a court ruling against it, these approaches would disregard the legal and moral responsibilities of the guardian to the ward’s expressed preferences. Consulting with a physician, while generally a sound practice, does not replace the necessity of following the directives set forth in the living will if clear instructions are provided. Therefore, adhering to the living will not only validates the ward's right to make choices about their health care but also reinforces the guardian's role in respecting those decisions