Should a guardian respect a ward's preferences?

A guardian has a fundamental obligation to respect a ward's preferences, particularly when these preferences do not pose a risk of harm to the ward or their property. This principle is grounded in the overarching goal of guardianship, which is to support the ward's autonomy and dignity while providing protection.

When assessing a ward's preferences, it's essential for a guardian to evaluate whether honoring those preferences contributes positively to the ward's well-being. For example, allowing a ward to make choices regarding their daily activities, living arrangements, or healthcare options fosters independence and respects their personal identity and desires.

While there are legal standards and financial considerations that play a significant role in the decision-making process of guardianship, a guardian must prioritize the best interests of the ward, provided that these interests do not conflict with potential harm to them or their property. This ensures that the guardian acts in a manner that is both ethical and aligned with the principles of person-centered care.

On the other hand, neglecting to consider a ward's preferences, as suggested in other choices, would undermine their rights and personal agency. A balanced approach that integrates respect for the ward's choices with an assessment of potential risks is crucial for effective guardianship.